Premium
The condom: why more people don't put it on
Author(s) -
Browne Jan,
Minichiello Victor
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
sociology of health and illness
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1467-9566
pISSN - 0141-9889
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347391
Subject(s) - condom , interpersonal communication , context (archaeology) , social psychology , psychology , reproductive health , negotiation , safer sex , interpersonal relationship , family planning , intervention (counseling) , developmental psychology , population , medicine , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , demography , sociology , family medicine , geography , research methodology , social science , archaeology , syphilis , psychiatry
This study sheds light on an important topic emerging in the sexual health debate – identifying the interpersonal nature of sexual relationships which influence condom use. Using the principles of grounded theory, in‐depth interviews were conducted with heterosexual men and women to understand the impact of the dyadic context of ‘heterosex’ on decisions to use condoms, condom availability and partner support and receptivity to cooperate in safer sex practices. The study found that condom dialogues occur at two levels ‐ ‘the interpersonal condom dialogues’ and the ‘internal or discursive condom dialogues’. These dialogues shape condom use/non‐use negotiations and the sexual encounter. Individuals also enter into sexual relations with a dislike of condoms and a perception of condom sex as ‘other sex’, which sets the context for their sexual experiences. Gender constructions of socially ‘appropriate’ sexual behaviour for men and women are implicated in the decisions to use condoms. The study highlights the importance of promoting condom sex as good and pleasurable sex if education and public health intervention programmes are to be effective in changing attitudes towards safer sex practices.