Premium
Can consumer choice replace trust in the National Health Service in England? Towards developing an affective psychosocial conception of trust in health care
Author(s) -
Fotaki Marianna
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
sociology of health and illness
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1467-9566
pISSN - 0141-9889
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9566.12170
Subject(s) - psychosocial , context (archaeology) , embodied cognition , conceptual framework , public relations , affect (linguistics) , interpersonal communication , health care , quality (philosophy) , service (business) , business , marketing , psychology , sociology , social psychology , economics , political science , economic growth , psychiatry , paleontology , social science , philosophy , communication , epistemology , artificial intelligence , computer science , biology
Trust has long been regarded as a vitally important aspect of the relationship between health service providers and patients. Recently, consumer choice has been increasingly advocated as a means of improving the quality and effectiveness of health service provision. However, it is uncertain how the increase of information necessary to allow users of health services to exercise choice, and the simultaneous introduction of markets in public health systems, will affect various dimensions of trust, and how changing relations of trust will impact upon patients and services. This article employs a theory‐driven approach to investigate conceptual and material links between choice, trust and markets in health care in the context of the National Health Service in England. It also examines the implications of patient choice on systemic, organisational and interpersonal trust. The article is divided into two parts. The first argues that the shift to marketisation in public health services might lead to an over‐reliance on rational‐calculative aspects of trust at the expense of embodied, relational and social attributes. The second develops an alternative psychosocial conception of trust: it focuses on the central role of affect and accounts for the material and symbolic links between choice, trust and markets in health care.