z-logo
Premium
‘Sick Role’ or ‘Empowerment’? The Ambiguities of Life with an HIV Positive Diagnosis
Author(s) -
Crossley Michele
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
sociology of health and illness
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1467-9566
pISSN - 0141-9889
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9566.00113
Subject(s) - empowerment , ideology , ethos , sick role , insider , psychology , rhetoric , sociology of health and illness , sociology , social psychology , medicine , epistemology , political science , medline , health care , politics , law , philosophy , linguistics
This paper addresses the relevance of Parsons’ concept of the ‘sick role’ to the experience of illness in contemporary society by building on recent research, which suggests that the increasing predominance of chronic disease changes the temporal structure of the experience of illness. This has important implications for the structure of social expectations and obligations associated with the ‘sick role’. In particular, recent advocates of ‘insider’ views of illness and the related promotion of ideologies of ‘patient empowerment’ have contested assumptions of dependency implicit within the concept of the ‘sick role’, presenting a far more ‘independent’ and ‘proactive’ vision of the sick individual. With specific application to a group of people living relatively long term with an HIV positive diagnosis, this paper addresses some of the implicit ambiguities manifest in the self‐empowerment ethos, highlighting some implicit dependencies underlying the rhetoric of empowerment and concluding that a more structural analysis of illness experiences, such as that proposed by Parsons, may be apposite.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here