Premium
How to Design a "Liberal" Welfare State: A Comparison of Canada and the United States
Author(s) -
Myles John
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
social policy and administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.972
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1467-9515
pISSN - 0144-5596
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9515.00120
Subject(s) - retrenchment , welfare state , poverty , welfare , economics , state (computer science) , distribution (mathematics) , distributive property , inequality , welfare reform , public economics , political science , market economy , public administration , economic growth , law , mathematical analysis , mathematics , algorithm , politics , pure mathematics , computer science
My aim in this paper is to show how differences in the programmatic design of two otherwise "liberal" welfare regimes have generated substantially different patterns of welfare state retrenchment and distributive outcomes since the 1970s. Welfare regimes are distinguished by the principles and rules that regulate transactions between the three institutional nuclei from which individuals derive their "welfare" in modern capitalist societies—the state, the market, and the family. Liberal regimes are characterized by a preference for market solutions to welfare problems. While Canada and the United States both represent paradigmatic instances of the liberal regime type, there are long‐standing differences in methods both of financing and distributing benefits. Differences in programme design led to substantially different retrenchment strategies from the end of the 1970s, which in turn produced dramatically different distributive outcomes: rising inequality and poverty rates in the United States compared to relative stability in the distribution of income among Canadian families.