Premium
Are Party Activists the Party Extremists? The Structure of Opinion in Political Parties
Author(s) -
Narud Hanne Marthe,
Skare Audun
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
scandinavian political studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.65
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-9477
pISSN - 0080-6757
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9477.00003
Subject(s) - political radicalism , political science , politics , proposition , duverger's law , cleavage (geology) , incentive , norwegian , realigning election , law and economics , political economy , public administration , law , primary election , general election , sociology , economics , socialism , epistemology , philosophy , linguistics , communism , geotechnical engineering , fracture (geology) , microeconomics , engineering
In re‐examining May’s law of curvilinear disparity, this article analyzes the structure of opinion of political parties. May suggests that voters, party leaders and party activists have different incentives to participate in politics, and therefore voters and leaders have more moderate positions on issues than party activists. This article is based on the extensions of May’s law made by Kitschelt, who argues that curvilinear disparities, although not general phenomena, are bound to occur in specific circumstances. We have focused on the level of cleavage conflict in the system, the variable that Kitschelt himself found to be critical for explaining party radicalism among sub‐leaders. Using the Norwegian multiparty system as a test case, we propose that radicalism among party activists is conditioned by the relative saliency of different policy dimensions. The empirical analysis, which is based on surveys of MPs, party members and voters in connection with the general election of 1993, gives very little support to our proposition.