z-logo
Premium
Twenty–first century United States governance: statecraft as reform craft and the peculiar governing paradox it perpetuates
Author(s) -
Stillman Richard J.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.313
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1467-9299
pISSN - 0033-3298
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9299.00335
Subject(s) - superpower , politics , state (computer science) , political science , faith , corporate governance , political economy , government (linguistics) , craft , law , sociology , economics , history , philosophy , management , linguistics , theology , archaeology , algorithm , computer science
The United States is commonly referred to as the last global superpower, exercising unrivalled political, economic, military and social influence. Yet, paradoxically, unlike any other nation, Americans were – and remain – radically antistatist. Until roughly the twentieth century the United States did not want, need, nor create a powerful administrative state to govern itself, let alone others abroad. This essay explores that peculiar paradox, namely how Americans govern as the last global superpower today, yet retain an inherently fierce hostility to government. The thesis that is developed argues that it is a deep–rooted reformist faith which ultimately shapes US statecraft as a unique style of reformcraft, with both benign and not–sobenign consequences.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here