How Do Citizens Evaluate Public Officials? The Role of Performance and Expectations on Political Trust
Author(s) -
Seyd Ben
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
political studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.406
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1467-9248
pISSN - 0032-3217
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9248.12163
Subject(s) - politics , perception , expectancy theory , trustworthiness , sample (material) , task (project management) , public relations , public trust , survey data collection , public opinion , political science , process (computing) , social psychology , psychology , economics , law , computer science , operating system , chemistry , statistics , mathematics , management , chromatography , neuroscience
This article examines how citizens judge the trustworthiness of public officials, focusing on one aspect of the cognitive process through which trust is assessed. It considers how far trust reflects not only the perceptions of how politicians behave but also prior expectations of that behaviour. ‘Expectancy disconfirmation’ models suggest that attitudes to public services are largely shaped by performance perceptions adjusted for expectations. Drawing on survey data from a sample of citizens in the UK , the results of this study are inconsistent with this model. Instead, trust is found primarily to reflect performance perceptions alone; expectations play little additional role in shaping citizen evaluations. This suggests that policy makers are unlikely to boost levels of political trust by reducing what citizens expect of politicians. Instead, policy makers concerned to improve their public image will have to undertake the harder task of improving their performance.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom