z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Should Kids Pay Their Own Way?
Author(s) -
Tomlin Patrick
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
political studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.406
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1467-9248
pISSN - 0032-3217
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9248.12111
Subject(s) - scrutiny , politics , raising (metalworking) , law and economics , ask price , law , political science , economics , finance , engineering , mechanical engineering
Children are expensive to raise. Ensuring that they are raised in such a way that they are able to lead a minimally decent life costs time and money, and lots of both. Who is responsible for bearing the costs of the things that children are undoubtedly owed? This is a question that has received comparatively little scrutiny from political philosophers, despite children being such a drain on public and private finances alike. To the extent that there is a debate, two main views can be identified. The P arents P ay view says that parents, responsible for the existence of the costs, must foot the bill. The S ociety P ays view says that a next generation is a benefit to all, and so to allow parents to foot the bill alone is the worst kind of free‐riding. In this article, I introduce a third potentially liable party currently missing from the debate: children themselves. On my backward‐looking view, we are entitled to ask people to contribute to the raising of children on the basis that they have benefited from being raised themselves.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom