z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Enacting Democracy
Author(s) -
Saward Michael
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
political studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.406
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1467-9248
pISSN - 0032-3217
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9248.00418
Subject(s) - democracy , construct (python library) , argument (complex analysis) , reflexivity , legislature , context (archaeology) , democratic theory , meaning (existential) , perspective (graphical) , epistemology , political science , sociology , law and economics , positive economics , public administration , law , social science , economics , computer science , politics , philosophy , paleontology , biochemistry , chemistry , artificial intelligence , biology , programming language
We do not need more ‘models of democracy’, but we do need a fresh view of democratic theory to take full advantage of deliberative, ecological, cosmopolitan and other innovations of recent years. Approaches such as these can be understood in terms of the devices they deploy – deliberative forums and cross‐border referendums, for example, as well as more familiar elections and legislatures. Devices enact democratic principles; indeed, it is argued that principles gain their meaning and force through enactment. Devices can also be reordered in different ways; democrats can construct sequences which enact democracy in particular, desired ways. Pursuing this argument involves adopting a reflexive and procedural perspective, which puts a premium on democracy as sensitive to context, open‐ended, productive and adaptable.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom