Premium
Conclusion: Four Recommendations to Improve Digital Electoral Oversight in the UK
Author(s) -
Margetts Helen,
Dommett Katharine
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the political quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.373
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1467-923X
pISSN - 0032-3179
DOI - 10.1111/1467-923x.12887
Subject(s) - action (physics) , government (linguistics) , field (mathematics) , political science , section (typography) , civil society , public administration , regulatory reform , law and economics , public relations , business , sociology , law , politics , philosophy , linguistics , physics , mathematics , quantum mechanics , advertising , pure mathematics
To conclude this special section, this article looks at the possible avenues for regulatory reform in the field of digital campaigning. Diagnosing the need for a multi‐layered approach, we argue that action is needed from government, regulators, companies, and civil society. We take each actor in turn and consider the kind of change needed, the prospects for reform, and outline four recommendations for change.