Premium
Public Inquiry Methods, Processes and Outputs: an Epistemological Critique
Author(s) -
Walshe Kieran
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the political quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.373
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1467-923X
pISSN - 0032-3179
DOI - 10.1111/1467-923x.12691
Subject(s) - divergence (linguistics) , phenomenon , perspective (graphical) , odds , sociology , epistemology , public policy , social science , engineering ethics , political science , law , computer science , philosophy , linguistics , logistic regression , artificial intelligence , engineering , machine learning
Public inquiries are an important phenomenon in modern British society, often used to address controversial or difficult issues of major concern to policy makers, the media and the public. Although people often comment adversely on how costly inquiries are and how long they take, inquiry methods are rarely discussed, let alone critiqued or challenged. However, from a social sciences perspective, inquiry methods, processes and outputs are often at odds with accepted standards for research methods. This paper discusses this divergence and the implications for how we should regard the inquiry as a way of knowing, or learning.