Premium
Integrating PHIGS and User Interface Systems
Author(s) -
Hardenbergh Jan,
Michener James
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
computer graphics forum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.578
H-Index - 120
eISSN - 1467-8659
pISSN - 0167-7055
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8659.1010027
Subject(s) - software portability , interface (matter) , computer science , user interface , task (project management) , variety (cybernetics) , database , human–computer interaction , operating system , systems engineering , engineering , artificial intelligence , bubble , maximum bubble pressure method
The past five years has seen an explosion of rich and effective user interface management systems and toolkits and an increase in the expectations regarding application portability. Nearly a decade old, the PHIGS input model is inadequate in the face of this variety. “Fixing PHIGS” input would be a long and arduous task. Instead, PHIGS should be adapted to cooperate, not compete, with user interface systems. This can be done in two ways. An application can use both PHIGS input and input from a user interface system to accomplish its goals. Alternatively, an application can use input only from a user interface system, but in this case it needs utilities in PHIGS to gain access to information only PHIGS can supply. Specifically the utilities are needed for application‐initiated picking and for coordinate mapping.