Premium
Inability of Five‐Month‐Old Infants to Retrieve a Contiguous Object: A Failure of Conceptual Understanding or of Control of Action?
Author(s) -
Diamond Adele,
Lee EunYoung
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
child development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.103
H-Index - 257
eISSN - 1467-8624
pISSN - 0009-3920
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8624.00241
Subject(s) - object (grammar) , psychology , action (physics) , control (management) , developmental psychology , cognitive psychology , reflexivity , artificial intelligence , computer science , physics , quantum mechanics , social science , sociology
Infants of 5 to 6 months of age can retrieve a free‐standing object, but fail to retrieve the same object from atop a slightly larger object. The accepted explanation has been that the infants do not understand that an object continues to exist independently when placed upon another. Predictions based on that explanation were tested against the hypothesis that infants' problem consists of lack of precision in visually guided reaching and lack of ability to inhibit reflexive reactions to touch. Twelve infants each at 5 and 7 months of age were tested on 16 trials. More 5‐month‐olds succeeded, in less time, and with fewer touches to an edge of the base, on trials more forgiving of an imprecise reach than on less forgiving trials. Success in retrieving objects close in size and fully contiguous with their bases was seen even at 5 months when the demands on skill in reaching were reduced. It is proposed that when 5‐month‐old infants fail to retrieve one object placed upon another, it is not because of a lack of conceptual understanding, but because they lack the skill to reach to the top object without accidentally touching an edge of the base en route.