Premium
Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single‐subject experimental research: description and application of four nonoverlap methods
Author(s) -
Rakap Salih
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
british journal of special education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.349
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1467-8578
pISSN - 0952-3383
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8578.12091
Subject(s) - subject (documents) , meta analysis , interpretation (philosophy) , computer science , single subject design , psychology , special education , mathematics education , educational research , management science , applied psychology , medicine , psychotherapist , engineering , library science , programming language
Single‐subject experimental research ( SSER ), one of the most commonly used research methods in special education and applied behaviour analysis, is a scientific, rigorous and valid method to evaluate the effectiveness of behavioural, educational and psychological treatments. However, studies using single‐subject experimental research designs are often excluded from meta‐analyses of evidence‐based practices due to the lack of methodological consensus on the type of effect size indices to be used to determine treatment effect. To promote the use of effect size indices as an adjunct to visual analysis, this article describes four nonoverlap methods ( PND , IRD , PEM‐T and T au‐ U ) and demonstrates their application to data obtained from studies employing different SSER designs. Advantages and disadvantages of each method are highlighted and considerations for selecting the most appropriate method are provided for researchers and practitioners.