Premium
Integration of Non‐market and Market Activities in Cross‐border Mergers and Acquisitions
Author(s) -
Ahammad Mohammad F.,
Tarba Shlomo Y.,
Frynas Jedrzej George,
Scola Andrew
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
british journal of management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1467-8551
pISSN - 1045-3172
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8551.12228
Subject(s) - adaptability , bridging (networking) , business , mergers and acquisitions , context (archaeology) , market integration , industrial organization , market share analysis , domestic market , factor market , market analysis , adaptive strategies , market microstructure , marketing , economics , market economy , order (exchange) , microeconomics , international trade , computer science , finance , management , computer network , paleontology , biology , history , archaeology
Drawing on resource dependence theory and the resource‐based view, we investigate the interactions between market and non‐market activities of firms in the context of the post‐merger integration phase in cross‐border mergers and acquisitions (M&As). Based on a cross‐country survey of 111 M&A practitioners who were personally involved in cross‐border M&As around the world, we test seven hypotheses on various market and non‐market aspects of post‐merger integration. We find a positive correlation between buffering strategies and adaptive capabilities in the non‐market environment and between bridging and adaptive capabilities in the market environment. However, we could not find any significant correlation between buffering and adaptive capabilities in the market environment and bridging and adaptive capabilities in the non‐market environment. We also find that adaptability in the non‐market environment is positively correlated with adaptability in the market environment, and in turn adaptability in the market environment leads to positive organizational performance of a cross‐border M&A. These results provide further support for the value of the alignment between market and non‐market activities and help to fill a gap in the literature on the market−non‐market interactions in post‐merger integration.