z-logo
Premium
Harming the Non‐conscious
Author(s) -
Persson Ingmar
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
bioethics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.494
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1467-8519
pISSN - 0269-9702
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8519.00158
Subject(s) - mistake , harm , consciousness , nothing , psychology , philosophy , epistemology , social psychology , law , political science
Peter Singer has argued that nothing done to a fetus before it acquires consciousness can harm it. At the same time, he concedes that a child can be harmed by something done to it when it was a non‐conscious fetus. But this implies that the non‐conscious fetus can be harmed. The mistake lies in thinking that, since existence can be intrinsically bad for a being only if it is conscious, it can be harmed only if it is conscious. In fact, its being harmed only implies that it could have been conscious (and led a good life).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here