z-logo
Premium
Compulsory Sterilisation in Sweden
Author(s) -
Tännsjö Torbjörn
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
bioethics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.494
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1467-8519
pISSN - 0269-9702
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8519.00110
Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , criticism , skepticism , autonomy , newspaper , sociology , law , law and economics , epistemology , political science , medicine , philosophy
In the Fall of 1997 the leading Swedish newspaper, Dagens Nyheter , created a media hype over the Swedish policy of compulsory sterilisation that had been in operation between 1935 and 1975. In the discussion that followed the moral condemnation of our medical past was unanimous. However, the reasons for rejecting what had gone on were varied and mutually inconsistent. Three strands of criticism were common: the argument from autonomy, the argument from caution, and the argument from biological scepticism. In the paper it is argued that what point of departure you choose in your criticism of the past should be of consequence also for your ideas about present and future medical practice. In particular, if you rely on the argument from autonomy, you should be prepared to accept a liberal (present and future) use of reproductive techniques.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here