Premium
Where evidence‐based policy meets research impact
Author(s) -
Gunn Andrew,
Mintrom Michael
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
australian journal of public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-8500
pISSN - 0313-6647
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8500.12499
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , political science , covid-19 , evidence based policy , pandemic , research policy , isolation (microbiology) , public administration , sociology , public relations , geography , biology , medicine , disease , archaeology , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , microbiology and biotechnology , alternative medicine
This paper explores the territory between the evidence‐based policymaking (EBPM) agenda and the research impact agenda. Although these two related agendas are typically considered in isolation, this paper provides an analysis dedicated to how they interact. It begins with a discussion outlining the origins of research impact and the use of evidence in policymaking. This is followed by an overview of the Australian policy context that shapes academic research and its impact. We argue that although the relationship between EBPM and research impact can be viewed as a symbiotic one, there are some tensions that arise in practice. Such difficulties can be further exacerbated when using research to inform policy in times of crisis, as illustrated by governing during the COVID‐19 pandemic. The insights provided contribute to our understanding of impact and are of value to policymakers and academic researchers as they help clarify the changing context within which they operate.