Premium
General Motor Holden's closure in Playford, South Australia: Analysis of the policy response and its implications for health
Author(s) -
BrowneYung Kathryn,
Ziersch Anna,
Baum Fran,
Friel Sharon,
Spoehr John
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
australian journal of public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-8500
pISSN - 0313-6647
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8500.12390
Subject(s) - closure (psychology) , fuel poverty , equity (law) , public economics , poverty , social policy , socioeconomic status , social determinants of health , government (linguistics) , health equity , shock (circulatory) , economics , development economics , political science , sociology , economic growth , health care , medicine , population , protocol (science) , linguistics , alternative medicine , demography , philosophy , pathology , law , market economy
Deindustrialisation and the closure of automotive manufacturing can differentially affect the socioeconomic prospects of workers and their communities, and contribute to social and health inequity. We used Bacchi's problematisation approach to examine the South Australian (SA) Labor government's policy responses to the General Motors Holden (GMH) Elizabeth plant closure announcement. We focused on the way that these policy responses framed the ‘problem’ of this major economic shock, particularly the extent to which potential social and health equity consequences were addressed. We found a narrow focus on economic strategies, neglecting the compounding impact of poverty in Playford, which may exacerbate health inequity. The community effects from the GMH closure remain uncertain and may be delayed for several years. SA requires better integrated social and economic policies to minimise social and health inequalities, as the consequences of the car manufacturing loss are realised.