Premium
Alternatives to Competitive Tendering and Privatisation: A Case Study from the Australian Health Industry
Author(s) -
Adams David,
Hess Michael
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
australian journal of public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-8500
pISSN - 0313-6647
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8500.00139
Subject(s) - restructuring , procurement , bureaucracy , public sector , private sector , public administration , politics , business , core (optical fiber) , quality (philosophy) , public service , economics , economic growth , marketing , finance , political science , economy , engineering , telecommunications , philosophy , epistemology , law
The international trend towards economic and financial management reforms is well documented with most governments now being involved in public sector restructuring programs, which have at their core the aim of improving the quality of administrative functions through a more responsive approach by state agencies (OECD 1996). In nations with administrative systems derived from British models these efforts may be generally referred to as ‘the de‐Sir Humphreying of the Westminister model’ (Hood 1990:105). In essence this approach has had three aims. First, it has attempted to diminish the role of thestate and make the bureaucracy more responsive to political leaders. Second, it has aimed for greater efficiency through the use of private sector management techniques. Third, it has focused on the citizen as a customer and service recipient (Aucoin 1990:16).