Premium
The “Thin Dividing Line”: Prime Ministers and the Problem of Australian Nationalism, 1972–1996[Note 1. This article is based on the author’s PhD thesis, ...]
Author(s) -
Curran James
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
australian journal of politics and history
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.123
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1467-8497
pISSN - 0004-9522
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8497.00271
Subject(s) - nationalism , politics , multiculturalism , prime (order theory) , cohesion (chemistry) , political science , prime minister , political economy , mythology , sociology , media studies , law , history , classics , chemistry , mathematics , organic chemistry , combinatorics
This paper is concerned with the way in which Australian prime ministers gave expression to an idea of “national community” in the post–1972 era. With the declining relevance of the British connection, the departure of “great and powerful” friends from the region, the imperative of engagement with Asia and the emerging concept of Australia as a “multicultural” society, one of the central challenges for these leaders has been whether or not they could offer an alternative myth of community which would preserve social cohesion in the new times. This raises an important historical question concerning Australian political culture at this time — what happened to the need for nationalism? By examining the speeches of Prime Ministers Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke and Keating, it can be seen that far from asserting an old–style, exclusive Australian nationalism, in most cases these leaders expressed great caution and hesitation towards the idea of nationalism itself.