Premium
Comment 1 on ‘Booming sector economics’ by Freebairn
Author(s) -
Gregory Robert G.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
australian journal of agricultural and resource economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.683
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1467-8489
pISSN - 1364-985X
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8489.12185
Subject(s) - boom , economics , frontier , competition (biology) , macro , per capita income , resource (disambiguation) , monetary economics , political science , ecology , computer network , demography , environmental engineering , law , sociology , computer science , biology , programming language , engineering
It is always good to end a review by suggesting where the future research frontier lies. With this in mind, it is important to emphasise the extraordinary nature of the current mining boom and slump. Only once in 150 years has Australian per capita income lifted as much as 15–20%, relative to that of the United States, and remained above US income levels for almost a decade. This extraordinary macro outcome was predominantly driven by trading gains, the result of resource export price increases relative to import prices. With export prices subsequently falling, Australia is moving towards a substantial decline in income relative to other advanced economies. This remarkable history provides both a unique macro quasi-experiment to enable us to understand better the impact of large trading gain shifts and an opportunity for special Australian research contributions to the world booming sector literature, in much the same way that occurred after the 1970s less substantial resource boom. In part 6 of the review, John Freebairn begins to focus on trading gains, but the journal-based academic literature inevitably lags behind our recent history. That history indicates quite clearly that resource economists should move away from their traditional emphasis on intersectoral resource competition and into the new territory of macroeconomy responses to large trading gain changes and a reassessment of the nature of our national accounts data. The textbook static theory of trading gains is well known (Kohli 2004; Coleman 2008), but the magnitude and dynamics of macroeconomic responses to substantial trading gain shifts is not. Let me illustrate this by comparing the income paths of the two major Australian ‘recessions’ of the last quarter-century. The income paths are measured by Real Gross Disposable Income (RGDI) per capita, which is Real Gross Domestic Product (RGDP) per capita adjusted to incorporate trading gain changes. In the major Australian income recession of the early 1990s, RGDI per capita fell 5% over two years and then recovered strongly. Almost all the RGDI fall was generated by RGDP falls with little trading gain contribution. From 2011, there is a longer-lasting income recession. RGDI per capita has fallen 4% over four years. This is a pure trading gain recession as RGDP per capita has continued to increase. All indications are that this recession will