Premium
Reconsidering royalty and resource rent taxes for Australian mining
Author(s) -
Freebairn John
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
australian journal of agricultural and resource economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.683
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1467-8489
pISSN - 1364-985X
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8489.12113
Subject(s) - economic rent , shareholder , revenue , economics , dominance (genetics) , resource (disambiguation) , tax deferral , imperfect , microeconomics , public economics , monetary economics , business , tax reform , finance , state income tax , computer science , gross income , gene , computer network , corporate governance , biochemistry , chemistry , linguistics , philosophy
It is argued that a comparative assessment of a royalty and a resource rent tax as a special tax on the Australian mining industry should recognise the following: the importance of quasi‐rents earned on investments which shift out the mining supply curve over time, the dominance of nonresidents as buyers and as shareholders, and available data on relative costs for mines with more and less favourable natural resource endowments. Comparable tax rates for the two special taxes to generate similar government revenue are derived. For approximate revenue neutral taxes, the efficiency and distributional effects of the royalty and resource rent tax options are assessed and compared. In terms of efficiency, the superiority of one over the other is ambiguous because of imperfect knowledge about key parameters. In terms of returns to Australia, and in particular the aggregate of transfers from nonresident shareholders and export buyers, both provide similar outcomes.