Premium
Income comparison and happiness: The role of fair income distribution
Author(s) -
Chen Yongwei,
Fu Dahai,
Ye Xinyue
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
australian economic papers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.351
H-Index - 15
eISSN - 1467-8454
pISSN - 0004-900X
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8454.12193
Subject(s) - happiness , economics , economic inequality , income distribution , income inequality metrics , proxy (statistics) , income in kind , demographic economics , comprehensive income , distribution (mathematics) , household income , inequality , labour economics , gross income , public economics , psychology , social psychology , geography , mathematical analysis , mathematics , tax reform , machine learning , computer science , state income tax , archaeology
Abstract Relative income gap is one of the most popular approaches for explaining the income–happiness relationship. We argue in this article that when people compare their incomes, they care about distributional fairness more than relative income disparity. It is difficult for us to explain China's income–happiness paradox if we simply compare the income gap and do not explore the income‐generation process leading to income inequality. We therefore employ an approach based on a responsibility‐sensitive theory of justice that decomposes individual income into fair and unfair components. As a proxy for distributional unfairness, unfair income is considered the main source of unhappiness. Using data from the Chinese Household Income Project survey, we find strong support for the negative relationship between income unfairness and happiness. We also find a significantly positive relationship between the relative income gap and income unfairness, which leads us to consider the income comparison hypothesis as the explanation for the income–happiness paradox in a new light. Sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of our results.