Premium
The Choice of Statistic on Which to Base Tight Upper Confidence Limits
Author(s) -
Kabaila Paul
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of statistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.434
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-842X
pISSN - 1369-1473
DOI - 10.1111/1467-842x.00021
Subject(s) - mathematics , limit (mathematics) , statistic , estimator , nuisance parameter , confidence interval , upper and lower bounds , statistics , scalar (mathematics) , mathematical analysis , geometry
We consider the problem of finding an upper 1 –α confidence limit (α < ½) for a scalar parameter of interest θ in the presence of a nuisance parameter vector ψ when the data are discrete. Using a statistic T as a starting point, Kabaila & Lloyd (1997) define what they call the tight upper limit with respect to T . This tight upper limit possesses certain attractive properties. However, these properties provide very little guidance on the choice of T itself. The practical recommendation made by Kabaila & Lloyd (1997) is that T be an approximate upper 1 –α confidence limit for θ rather than, say, an approximately median unbiased estimator of θ. We derive a large sample approximation which provides strong theoretical support for this recommendation.