z-logo
Premium
Visuality and Unmediation in Burne‐Jones’s Laus Veneris
Author(s) -
Peters Corbett David
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
art history
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.1
H-Index - 19
eISSN - 1467-8365
pISSN - 0141-6790
DOI - 10.1111/1467-8365.00250
Subject(s) - contest , painting , character (mathematics) , dialectic , constitution , art history , art , aesthetics , philosophy , visual arts , epistemology , law , theology , geometry , mathematics , political science
This article argues that a contest between the image and verbal knowledge is central to the work of Burne‐Jones and that this contest thematizes cultural tensions around the capacity of the visual arts to deal adequately with the new conditions of contemporary experience. Contrary to most established readings, I argue that Burne‐Jones’s painting possessed for contemporaries the possibility of critical potential in its resistance to the instrumental values of late nineteenth‐century modernity and that this potential was expressed most powerfully through their visual character. But if Burne‐Jones’s dream was critical in this way, it was also insecure. Opposing the visual to the word as forms of effective knowledge about reality, Burne‐Jones’s paintings of the 1870s nonetheless turn out to be dependent on the word and to enact a dialectic between word and image as a central part of their constitution

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here