Peer Commentaries on ‘Young infants’ expectations about hidden objects: a reply to three challenges’ by Renée Baillargeon and ‘Do infants possess innate knowledge structures? The con side’ by Linda B. Smith | Zendy

Premium

Peer Commentaries on ‘Young infants’ expectations about hidden objects: a reply to three challenges’ by Renée Baillargeon and ‘Do infants possess innate knowledge structures? The con side’ by Linda B. Smith

Publication year - 1999

Publication title -

developmental science

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.801

H-Index - 127

eISSN - 1467-7687

pISSN - 1363-755X

DOI - 10.1111/1467-7687.00063

Subject(s) - bates , psychological nativism , psychology , cognitive science , object (grammar) , dichotomy , representation (politics) , psychoanalysis , epistemology , philosophy , linguistics , history , archaeology , immigration , politics , political science , law , engineering , aerospace engineering

Commentaries Elizabeth S. Spelke, Innateness, learning and the development of object representation , p.145 Elizabeth Bates, Nativism versus development: comments on Baillargeon and Smith , p.148 Kurt W. Fischer and Jeffrey Stewart, Into the middle of things: from dichotomies to grounded dynamic analysis of development , p.150 Pim Haselager, Levels of learning , p.152 Marshall M. Haith, Some thoughts about claims for innate knowledge and infant physical reasoning , p.153

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research