z-logo
Premium
Regulation, Vertical Integration and Sabotage
Author(s) -
Beard T. Randolph,
Kaserman David L.,
Mayo John W.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
the journal of industrial economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.93
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1467-6451
pISSN - 0022-1821
DOI - 10.1111/1467-6451.00152
Subject(s) - incentive , vertical integration , upstream (networking) , downstream (manufacturing) , constraint (computer aided design) , industrial organization , microeconomics , bertrand competition , economics , welfare , business , market economy , cournot competition , operations management , computer science , oligopoly , engineering , computer network , mechanical engineering
We consider the incentive of a dominant firm that supplies a necessary input to a Bertrand‐competitive differentiated products downstream industry to: (1) vertically integrate forward, and (2) raise its downstream rivals’ costs through non‐price activities which we characterize generally as ‘sabotage’. We examine these incentives both in the absence and presence of a regulatory constraint on the upstream price. We find that, while an incentive for vertical integration is present regardless of the existence of the regulatory constraint, the incentive for sabotage emerges only in the presence of binding input price regulation. Welfare effects are also explored.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here