z-logo
Premium
The Antitrust Implications of Capacity Reallocation by a Dominant Firm
Author(s) -
Gale Ian,
O’Brien Daniel P.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
the journal of industrial economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.93
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1467-6451
pISSN - 0022-1821
DOI - 10.1111/1467-6451.00143
Subject(s) - industrial organization , business , consent decree , microeconomics , decree , market structure , economics , law , political science
When a firm acquires rival firms in one market, and moves their capacity to another market, should antitrust authorities be concerned? We address this question by studying a multi‐stage game. A dominant firm has the opportunity to acquire fringe firms that operate in the same market. Then, the dominant firm has the opportunity to move capacity from that market to a second market. The model is motivated by a series of acquisitions in the Specialized Mobile Radio industry aimed at establishing a new cellular carrier. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the dominant firm to acquire too little capacity relative to the social optimum. The results shed light on the Consent Decree negotiated in US v. Motorola Inc. and Nextel Communications Inc., 1994 .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here