z-logo
Premium
State Versus Civil Society? A Non‐Binary Model of Domination Through the Example of Israel
Author(s) -
BenEliezer Uri
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of historical sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.186
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1467-6443
pISSN - 0952-1909
DOI - 10.1111/1467-6443.00068
Subject(s) - hegemony , state (computer science) , civil society , constitution , meaning (existential) , mythology , sociology , population , political science , law , political economy , epistemology , politics , philosophy , theology , mathematics , demography , algorithm
Through the Israeli case, the article questions the validity of the Western liberal model according to which (civil) "society" and "state" are two separate entities, the state ostensibly existing outside the society and imposing its will on it. Covering five distinct historical periods, from the beginning of the century until the present, and utilizing Antonio Gramsci’s concept of hegemony, the article surveys one of Israel’s core myths, if not the core itself, that of the pioneer ( halutz ). The result exposes an intriguing system of domination, which is based on intensive activity and responsiveness of the population, and on a blurred distinction between the rulers and the ruled, between objects and subjects, and between state and society. Because of the existence of this system of domination it is difficult to talk about Israel in terms of a despotic state; hence also the obstacle to the constitution of a civil society in Israel. For this is effectively a hegemonic system of domination, which repels all social change by its ability to absorb any innovation and shape its meaning.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here