Premium
A framework for the analysis of interview data from multiple field research sites
Author(s) -
Lillis Anne M.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
accounting and finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.645
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1467-629X
pISSN - 0810-5391
DOI - 10.1111/1467-629x.00018
Subject(s) - impartiality , protocol (science) , field (mathematics) , computer science , protocol analysis , data collection , context (archaeology) , management science , data science , research design , completeness (order theory) , process (computing) , psychology , engineering , sociology , medicine , mathematics , epistemology , social science , paleontology , philosophy , mathematical analysis , alternative medicine , pathology , pure mathematics , biology , operating system , cognitive science
In general, papers reporting the results of research studies disclose little detail regarding attributes of study design, analytical processes and methods actually used by researchers. This paper describes in some depth the method choices and analytical protocol used in a field study project. The paper describes initially the link between research question, research design and analytical protocol. The major focus of the paper is the application of a systematic analytical protocol designed to encourage completeness and impartiality in the collection and analysis of qualitative data. These method issues are examined in the context of the author's experiences in the field and through the process of data analysis. The methods used are also examined critically in retrospect.