Premium
Some Dogmatic Implications of Barth’s Understanding of Ebionite and Docetic Christology
Author(s) -
Molnar Paul D.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
international journal of systematic theology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.149
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 1468-2400
pISSN - 1463-1652
DOI - 10.1111/1463-1652.00033
Subject(s) - christology , philosophy , ideology , uniqueness , order (exchange) , theology , epistemology , religious studies , psychology , social psychology , law , political science , finance , politics , economics
This article shows how Barth’s understanding of Ebionite andDocetic Christology shaped his trinitarian theology and argues that theologianstoday should learn from Barth in order to avoid the pitfalls of groundingChrist’s uniqueness either in experience or in an ideology instead of in Christ himself. The article exhibits how Barth’s insights relate to the views of a number of prominent contemporary theologians, illustrating how thesetheologians, in varying ways, actually reach problematic conclusions preciselyto the extent that they do not actually begin their christological reflections with the fact that Jesus is the Son of God simply because he is.