Premium
NanoSIMS sample preparation decreases isotope enrichment: magnitude, variability and implications for single‐cell rates of microbial activity
Author(s) -
Meyer Nicolette R.,
Fortney Julian L.,
Dekas Anne E.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
environmental microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.954
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1462-2920
pISSN - 1462-2912
DOI - 10.1111/1462-2920.15264
Subject(s) - stable isotope probing , biology , pseudomonas putida , archaea , isotope , isotopes of nitrogen , biogeochemical cycle , stable isotope ratio , microbial ecology , microbial population biology , microorganism , environmental chemistry , bacteria , ecology , genetics , chemistry , physics , quantum mechanics
Summary The activity of individual microorganisms can be measured within environmental samples by detecting uptake of isotope‐labelled substrates using nano‐scale secondary ion mass spectrometry (nanoSIMS). Recent studies have demonstrated that sample preparation can decrease 13 C and 15 N enrichment in bacterial cells, resulting in underestimates of activity. Here, we explore this effect with a variety of preparation types, microbial lineages and isotope labels to determine its consistency and therefore potential for correction. Specifically, we investigated the impact of different protocols for fixation, nucleic acid staining and catalysed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD‐FISH) on >14 500 archaeal and bacterial cells ( Methanosarcina acetivorans , Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and Pseudomonas putida ) enriched in 13 C, 15 N, 18 O, 2 H and/or 34 S. We found these methods decrease isotope enrichments by up to 80% – much more than previously reported – and that the effect varies by taxa, growth phase, isotope label and applied protocol. We make recommendations for how to account for this effect experimentally and analytically. We also re‐evaluate published nanoSIMS datasets and revise estimated microbial turnover times in the marine subsurface and nitrogen fixation rates in pelagic unicellular cyanobacteria. When sample preparation is accounted for, cell‐specific rates increase and are more consistent with modelled and bulk rates.