Premium
Using the cognitive interviewing process to improve survey design by allied health: A qualitative study
Author(s) -
Howlett Owen,
McKinstry Carol,
Lannin Natasha A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
australian occupational therapy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.595
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1440-1630
pISSN - 0045-0766
DOI - 10.1111/1440-1630.12445
Subject(s) - interview , cognitive interview , cognition , applied psychology , process (computing) , psychology , medical education , qualitative research , survey methodology , medicine , computer science , psychiatry , social science , pathology , sociology , political science , law , operating system
Background/aim Allied health professionals frequently use surveys to collect data for clinical practice and service improvement projects. Careful development and piloting of purpose‐designed surveys is important to ensure intended measuring (that respondents correctly interpret survey items when responding). Cognitive interviewing is a specific technique that can improve the design of self‐administered surveys. The aim of this study was to describe the use of the cognitive interviewing process to improve survey design, which involved a purpose‐designed, online survey evaluating staff use of functional electrical stimulation. Methods A qualitative study involving one round of cognitive interviewing with three occupational therapists and three physiotherapists. Results The cognitive interviewing process identified 11 issues with the draft survey, which could potentially influence the validity and quality of responses. The raised issues included difficulties with: processing the question to be able to respond, determining a response to the question, retrieving relevant information from memory and comprehending the written question. Twelve survey amendments were made following the cognitive interviewing process, comprising four additions, seven revisions and one correction. Conclusions The cognitive interviewing process applied during the development of a purpose‐designed survey enabled the identification of potential problems and informed revisions to the survey prior to its use.