Premium
Effects of decreasing source/sink ratio in soybeans on photosynthesis, photorespiration, transpiration and yield
Author(s) -
PEET M. M.,
KRAMER P. J.
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1111/1365-3040.ep11581547
Subject(s) - point of delivery , shading , photosynthesis , photorespiration , transpiration , horticulture , biology , cultivar , agronomy , botany , art , visual arts
. Shading of all side leaflets of a determinate soybean cultivar during pod filling significantly increased rates of photosynthesis in the unshaded centre leaflets, compared to centre leaflets of controls. Higher rates were associated with both higher stomatal and mesophyll conductances, and were reversible within 2 days when shades were removed. These higher rates of photosynthesis were not associated with decreased percentage enhancement by low oxygen, indicating that treatment effects were probably not associated with changes in photorespiration relative to photosynthesis. Percentage enhancement did, however increase as the plants approached physiological maturity, chiefly because of a decrease in photosynthesis. In spite of these increases in rates of photosynthesis seed weight per plant was decreased by 37% in plants with side leaflets shaded for the entire pod‐filling period and by 28% in plants shaded for only the second half of the period. In plants where shades were removed during the second half of pod filling seed yield was reduced by only 19% because shade removal delayed leaf senescence. The four treatments reduced yield by different mechanisms. Plants shaded continuously during pod filling produced fewer seeds than controls, but the weight per seed was similar. When shading was applied during the second half of pod fillings seed number was unchanged but weight per seed was significantly reduced. In contrast when shades were removed for the second half of pod filling, seed number remained similar to that of continuously shaded plants, but seed weight increased. Although all shading treatments reduced yield, the reduction was not proportional to the 63% reduction in leaf area available for photosynthesis. This was because (1) photosynthetic rates in the centre leaflet of shaded plants were higher than rates in controls, (2) stem and lower surface photosynthesis in shaded leaf‐lets contributed to whole leaflet photosynthesis.