Premium
Understanding the fate of shrimp aquaculture effluent in a mangrove ecosystem: Aiding management for coastal conservation
Author(s) -
Hargan Kathryn E.,
Williams Branwen,
Nuangsaeng Bunlung,
Siriwong Sarawut,
Tassawad Pisut,
Chaiharn Chatdanai,
McAdoo Brian,
Los Huertos Marc
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of applied ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.503
H-Index - 181
eISSN - 1365-2664
pISSN - 0021-8901
DOI - 10.1111/1365-2664.13579
Subject(s) - mangrove , shrimp , aquaculture , shrimp farming , environmental science , fishery , avicennia marina , bay , ecosystem , marine ecosystem , ecology , biology , oceanography , geology , fish <actinopterygii>
Areas dedicated to shrimp aquaculture have increased dramatically over the last 50 years. Resultant land‐use changes directly threaten the extent of mangroves and yield conflicts on the discharge location of aquaculture effluent. Khung Krabaen Bay (KBB), Thailand, is reforesting mangroves while increasing the efficiency of shrimp aquaculture for local farmers. In this coupled shrimp farm–mangrove system, effective management requires understanding the fate of aquaculture organic matter (OM) in the coastal environment. We examined carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios (δ 13 C, δ 15 N) in primary producers and pools of particulate and sediment OM (POM, SOM) from the KKB mangrove and marine ecosystem to determine how shrimp aquaculture OM contributes to the coastal environment. Here, soy‐based shrimp feed resulted in low shrimp δ 15 N, similar to marine POM, and thus we focus on the use of δ 13 C in tracking shrimp pond effluent in the environment. δ 13 C signatures of SOM varied significantly along a land‐to‐ocean gradient (–29.1‰ to –23.9‰). We found consistently depleted mangrove SOM δ 13 C signatures (–29.4‰ to –28.2‰) indicating that mangrove leaf litter is the primary source of OM to mangrove sediments, and there is little evidence that marine and shrimp pond OM contributes to the mangrove habitat. In contrast, relatively low δ 13 C values for marine SOM (–25.7‰ to –23.9‰) overlap with the δ 13 C of shrimp feed (–25.3‰) and Bayesian mixing models indicate that shrimp aquaculture feed and mangrove vegetation contribute the greatest OM to the marine ecosystem. Compared to 20 years ago, marine SOM δ 13 C signatures are depleted by ~10‰ and similar throughout KKB, indicating a homogenization of marine SOM carbon sources from 1998 to 2018. Synthesis and applications. The doubling of shrimp aquaculture in Khung Krabaen Bay (KKB) since 1998 led to increased discharge to the bay, swamping organic matter (OM) contributions from 13 C‐enriched seagrasses and marine plankton. Because of this increase in effluent release to KKB, the chemical impact is likely to be greater for the marine ecosystem than the mangrove and should also be a focus of conservation efforts. Continued technological improvements (e.g. closed systems, better feed efficiency) and support to local aquaculture farmers will help reduce OM discharge to coastal ecosystems and promote sustainable farming practices.