z-logo
Premium
Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits
Author(s) -
Cook Chelsea N.,
Mosqueiro Thiago,
Brent Colin S.,
Ozturk Cahit,
Gadau Jürgen,
PinterWollman Noa,
Smith Brian H.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of animal ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.134
H-Index - 157
eISSN - 1365-2656
pISSN - 0021-8790
DOI - 10.1111/1365-2656.12911
Subject(s) - foraging , forage , associative learning , boy scouts , biology , ecology , preference , resource (disambiguation) , quality (philosophy) , social learning , eusociality , zoology , psychology , geography , hymenoptera , computer network , philosophy , pedagogy , archaeology , epistemology , neuroscience , computer science , economics , microeconomics
Animals must effectively balance the time they spend exploring the environment for new resources and exploiting them. One way that social animals accomplish this balance is by allocating these two tasks to different individuals. In honeybees, foraging is divided between scouts, which tend to explore the landscape for novel resources, and recruits, which tend to exploit these resources. Exploring the variation in cognitive and physiological mechanisms of foraging behaviour will provide a deeper understanding of how the division of labour is regulated in social insect societies. Here, we uncover how honeybee foraging behaviour may be shaped by predispositions in performance of latent inhibition (LI), which is a form of non‐associative learning by which individuals learn to ignore familiar information. We compared LI between scouts and recruits, hypothesizing that differences in learning would correlate with differences in foraging behaviour. Scouts seek out and encounter many new odours while locating novel resources, while recruits continuously forage from the same resource, even as its quality degrades. We found that scouts show stronger LI than recruits, possibly reflecting their need to discriminate forage quality. We also found that scouts have significantly elevated tyramine compared to recruits. Furthermore, after associative odour training, recruits have significantly diminished octopamine in their brains compared to scouts. These results suggest that individual variation in learning behaviour shapes the phenotypic behavioural differences between different types of honeybee foragers. These differences in turn have important consequences for how honeybee colonies interact with their environment. Uncovering the proximate mechanisms that influence individual variation in foraging behaviour is crucial for understanding the ecological context in which societies evolve.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here