Premium
How Ebola impacts social dynamics in gorillas: a multistate modelling approach
Author(s) -
Genton Céline,
Pierre Amandine,
Cristescu Romane,
Lévréro Florence,
Gatti Sylvain,
Pierre JeanSébastien,
Ménard Nelly,
Le Gouar Pascaline
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of animal ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.134
H-Index - 157
eISSN - 1365-2656
pISSN - 0021-8790
DOI - 10.1111/1365-2656.12268
Subject(s) - population , outbreak , demography , biology , social dynamics , infectious disease (medical specialty) , ebola virus , geography , disease , ecology , medicine , pathology , virology , sociology , artificial intelligence , computer science
SummaryEmerging infectious diseases can induce rapid changes in population dynamics and threaten population persistence. In socially structured populations, the transfers of individuals between social units, for example, from breeding groups to non‐breeding groups, shape population dynamics. We suggest that diseases may affect these crucial transfers. We aimed to determine how disturbance by an emerging disease affects demographic rates of gorillas, especially transfer rates within populations and immigration rates into populations. We compared social dynamics and key demographic parameters in a gorilla population affected by Ebola using a long‐term observation data set including pre‐, during and post‐outbreak periods. We also studied a population of undetermined epidemiological status in order to assess whether this population was affected by the disease. We developed a multistate model that can handle transition between social units while optimizing the number of states. During the Ebola outbreak, social dynamics displayed increased transfers from a breeding to a non‐breeding status for both males and females. Six years after the outbreak, demographic and most of social dynamics parameters had returned to their initial rates, suggesting a certain resilience in the response to disruption. The formation of breeding groups increased just after Ebola, indicating that environmental conditions were still attractive. However, population recovery was likely delayed because compensatory immigration was probably impeded by the potential impact of Ebola in the surrounding areas. The population of undetermined epidemiological status behaved similarly to the other population before Ebola. Our results highlight the need to integrate social dynamics in host‐population demographic models to better understand the role of social structure in the sensitivity and the response to disease disturbances.