Premium
Direct migration of ambient seismic data
Author(s) -
Girard Aaron J.,
Shragge Jeffrey
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
geophysical prospecting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.735
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1365-2478
pISSN - 0016-8025
DOI - 10.1111/1365-2478.12792
Subject(s) - deconvolution , ambient noise level , geology , geophysical imaging , seismology , energy (signal processing) , passive seismic , seismic noise , reflection (computer programming) , seismic migration , synthetic data , environmental geology , amplitude , geophysics , remote sensing , computer science , algorithm , optics , physics , tectonics , quantum mechanics , geomorphology , telmatology , programming language , sound (geography)
Utilising ambient seismic energy naturally propagating in the Earth as an alternative approach to active body‐wave seismic investigations has been a topic of interest for a number of decades. However, because ambient surface‐wave arrivals typically are of much greater amplitude than ambient body‐wave energy, significant data signal processing and long recording times are required to mitigate this and other coherent noise sources, and to correlate sufficient reflected body‐wave energy to converge to a stable image. Even for these scenarios, identifying and validating imaged body‐wave reflection events remain challenging. In active‐source investigations, extended imaging condition gathers are used to examine velocity (in)accuracy. Herein, we develop an ambient direct migration approach that uses a novel ambient (deconvolution) extended imaging condition. We simulate synthetic ambient‐wavefield seismic data for two different models and use a field data set from Lalor Lake in Manitoba, Canada, to conduct a series of numerical experiments to demonstrate the velocity sensitivity and long‐term stationarity of ambient‐wavefield seismic data in the migration image domain. Tests with varying global velocity perturbations show a characteristic reflector moveout in deconvolution extended imaging condition gathers that can serve as a diagnostic of reflected ambient body‐wave energy. We illustrate that this imaging formalism, under idealised circumstances, gives comparable results to conventional seismic methods, which extends the use of extended imaging condition gather‐based image validation to ambient‐wavefield seismic data scenarios. We assert that this may be a valuable tool for the validation of ambient migration techniques that to date have yielded largely inconclusive results.