Premium
Breadth of the thermal response captures individual and geographic variation in temperature‐dependent sex determination
Author(s) -
Carter Anna L.,
Bodensteiner Brooke L.,
Iverson John B.,
MilneZelman Carrie L.,
Mitchell Timothy S.,
Refsnider Jeanine M.,
Warner Daniel A.,
Janzen Fredric J.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
functional ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.272
H-Index - 154
eISSN - 1365-2435
pISSN - 0269-8463
DOI - 10.1111/1365-2435.13410
Subject(s) - biology , local adaptation , painted turtle , population , adaptation (eye) , ecology , incubation , variation (astronomy) , avian clutch size , latitude , zoology , reproduction , demography , turtle (robot) , geography , biochemistry , physics , geodesy , neuroscience , sociology , astrophysics
Population‐scale responses of key ecological traits to local environmental conditions provide insight into their adaptive potential. In species with temperature‐dependent sex determination (TSD), short‐term, individual developmental responses to the incubation environment have long‐term consequences for populations. We took a model‐based approach to study within‐ and among‐population variation in the physiological components of TSD in 12 populations of painted turtles ( Chrysemys picta ). We used laboratory and field incubation data to quantify variation in thermal reaction norms at both population and clutch scales, focusing on the pivotal temperature that produces a 1:1 sex ratio ( P ) and the transitional range of incubation temperatures (TRTs) that produce mixed sex ratios. Defying theoretical expectations, among‐population variation in P was not convincingly explained by geography or local thermal conditions. However, within some populations, P varied by >5°C at the clutch scale, indicating that the temperature sensitivity of gonadal differentiation can vary substantially among individual nesting females. In addition, the TRT was wider at lower latitudes, suggesting responsiveness to local incubation conditions. Our results provide a potential explanation for discrepancies observed between constant‐temperature experimental results and outcomes of fluctuating incubation conditions experienced in natural nests, exposing important knowledge gaps in our understanding of local adaptation in TSD and identifying shortcomings of traditional laboratory studies. Understanding individual variation and the timing of gonadal differentiation is likely to be far more useful in understanding local adaptation than previously acknowledged. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.