Premium
Cell compartmentation of ultraviolet‐absorbing compounds: An underexplored tool related to bryophyte ecology, phylogeny and evolution
Author(s) -
Monforte Laura,
Soriano Gonzalo,
NúñezOlivera Encarnación,
MartínezAbaigar Javier
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
functional ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.272
H-Index - 154
eISSN - 1365-2435
pISSN - 0269-8463
DOI - 10.1111/1365-2435.13048
Subject(s) - bryophyte , biology , botany , phylogenetic tree , ecology , phylogenetics , moss , gene , biochemistry
Excessive exposure to ultraviolet ( UV ) radiation can be harmful to photosynthetic organisms, that most frequently respond with the accumulation of protective UV ‐absorbing compounds ( UVAC s). UVAC s location in different cell compartments can influence their preferential protective role as antioxidants and/or UV screens. However, the phylogenetic, ecological and evolutionary implications of UVAC s compartmentation has been little studied, particularly in bryophytes. We analysed UVACs in the methanol‐soluble and ‐insoluble fractions ( SUVAC s and IUVAC s respectively) in extracts of 87 bryophytes belonging to their three evolutionary lineages: 22 liverworts, 64 mosses and one hornwort. Assuming that the cell wall‐bound IUVAC s are more effective UV screens than the mainly vacuolar SUVAC s, thus conferring a higher UV tolerance, we evaluated whether UVAC s levels and compartmentation were related to: (1) the bryophyte phylogeny down to the Order level; and (2) the bryophyte ecological attributes, including sun exposure and Ellenberg indicator values (numerical system classifying species' habitat along gradients of environmental factors). A similar phylogenetic and ecological analysis was conducted on the sclerophylly index (the ratio between the dry mass and the surface area of the bryophyte shoot). Mosses showed lower SUVAC s but higher IUVAC s and total UVAC s, together with higher IUVAC / SUVAC ratios, than liverworts. Thus, mosses would better tolerate UV radiation than liverworts, which matches well with their general ecological preferences. As bryophytes were the earliest diverging land plants, we could infer that the different UVAC s compartmentation between mosses and liverworts could have influenced their ecological segregation upon plant land colonization. UVAC s compartmentation also differed between the two major moss lineages (acrocarpous and pleurocarpous), while the anatomically peculiar Sphagnales were the best characterized Order. There were not solid relationships between UVAC s and the ecological attributes considered. Hence, UVAC s might be mainly constitutive in bryophytes, depending more on the species phylogeny than on the habitat occupied in nature. Liverworts were less sclerophyllous than mosses, and, as in tracheophytes, water restrictions and high sun exposures increased sclerophylly. In conclusion, UVAC s compartmentation represents an ecophysiological trait useful to understand the bryophyte ecophylogeny, because different compartmentation modalities seem to imply different UV adaptations and tolerance. A plain language summary is available for this article.