Premium
Membrane filter method to study the effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium longum on fecal microbiota
Author(s) -
Shimizu Hidenori,
Benno Yoshimi
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
microbiology and immunology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.664
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1348-0421
pISSN - 0385-5600
DOI - 10.1111/1348-0421.12332
Subject(s) - biology , lactobacillus acidophilus , bifidobacterium longum , microbiology and biotechnology , probiotic , bifidobacterium , gut flora , ruminococcus , feces , lactobacillus , clostridium , bifidobacterium animalis , bacteria , biochemistry , genetics
A large number of commensal bacteria inhabit the intestinal tract, and interbacterial communication among gut microbiota is thought to occur. In order to analyze symbiotic relationships between probiotic strains and the gut microbiota, a ring with a membrane filter fitted to the bottom was used for in vitro investigations. Test strains comprising probiotic nitto strains ( Lactobacillus acidophilus NT and Bifidobacterium longum NT) and type strains ( L. acidophilus JCM1132 T and B. longum JCM1217 T ) were obtained from diluted fecal samples using the membrane filter to simulate interbacterial communication. Bifidobacterium spp., Streptococcus pasteurianus , Collinsella aerofaciens , and Clostridium spp. were the most abundant gut bacteria detected before coculture with the test strains. Results of the coculture experiments indicated that the test strains significantly promote the growth of Ruminococcus gnavus , Ruminococcus torques , and Veillonella spp. and inhibit the growth of Sutterella wadsworthensis . Differences in the relative abundances of gut bacterial strains were furthermore observed after coculture of the fecal samples with each test strain. Bifidobacterium spp., which was detected as the dominant strain in the fecal samples, was found to be unaffected by coculture with the test strains. In the present study, interbacterial communication using bacterial metabolites between the test strains and the gut microbiota was demonstrated by the coculture technique. The detailed mechanisms and effects of the complex interbacterial communications that occur among the gut microbiota are, however, still unclear. Further investigation of these relationships by coculture of several fecal samples with probiotic strains is urgently required.