Premium
Enhancement of the immunogenicity of a porcine circovirus type 2 DNA vaccine by a recombinant plasmid coexpressing capsid protein and porcine interleukin‐6 in mice
Author(s) -
Guo XiaoQing,
Wang LinQing,
Qiao Han,
Yang XingWu,
Yang MingFan,
Chen HongYing
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
microbiology and immunology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.664
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1348-0421
pISSN - 0385-5600
DOI - 10.1111/1348-0421.12244
Subject(s) - porcine circovirus , biology , immunogenicity , virology , dna vaccination , circovirus , immune system , plasmid , capsid , cellular immunity , immunology , virus , immunization , dna , genetics
The development of effective vaccines against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) has been accepted as an important strategy in the prophylaxis of post‐weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome; a DNA vaccine expressing the major immunogenic capsid (Cap) protein of PCV2 is considered to be a promising candidate. However, DNA vaccines usually induce weak immune responses. In this study, it was found that the efficacy of a DNA vaccine expressing Cap protein was improved by simultaneous expression of porcine IL‐6. A plasmid (pIRES‐ORF2/IL6) separately expressing both Cap protein and porcine IL‐6 was constructed and compared with another plasmid (pIRES‐ORF2) expressing Cap protein for its potential to induce PCV2‐specific immune responses. Mice were vaccinated i.m. twice at 3 week intervals and the induced humoral and cellular responses evaluated. All animals vaccinated with pIRES‐ORF2/IL6 and pIRES‐ORF2 developed specific anti‐PCV2 antibodies (according to enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay) and a T lymphocyte proliferation response. The percentages of CD3 + , CD3 + CD8 + , and CD3 + CD4 + subgroups of peripheral blood T‐lymphocytes were significantly higher in mice immunized with pIRES‐ORF2/IL6 than in those that had received pIRES‐ORF2. After challenge with the virulent PCV2 Wuzhi isolate, mice vaccinated with pIRES‐ORF2/IL6 had significantly less viral replication than those vaccinated with pIRES‐ORF2, suggesting that the protective immunity induced by pIRES‐ORF2/IL6 is superior to that induced by pIRES‐ORF2.