Premium
Does the Provision of Non‐Audit Services Impair Auditor Independence?
Author(s) -
Craswell Allen T.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
international journal of auditing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.583
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1099-1123
pISSN - 1090-6738
DOI - 10.1111/1099-1123.00047
Subject(s) - auditor independence , audit , accounting , business , audit evidence , joint audit , independence (probability theory) , chief audit executive , audit plan , external auditor , information technology audit , auditor's report , internal audit , statistics , mathematics
The provision of management advisory and other services by auditors to their audit clients has long been regarded, by regulators in Australia and overseas, as a threat to auditor independence. Evidence of the impact of non‐audit services on auditors' independence has been derived using case studies and questionnaires and has focused on perceptions of independence. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether the provision of non‐audit services impairs auditor independence by testing for an association between the provision of non‐audit services and auditors' reporting opinions. Based on publicly available information for Australian listed companies for several years, the evidence suggests that auditors' decisions to qualify their opinions are not affected by the provision of non‐audit services.