Premium
Corporatism, Pluralism, and Democracy: Toward a Deliberative Theory of Bureaucratic Accountability
Author(s) -
Hunold Christian
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
governance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.46
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1468-0491
pISSN - 0952-1895
DOI - 10.1111/0952-1895.00156
Subject(s) - deliberation , bureaucracy , corporatism , pluralism (philosophy) , accountability , political science , deliberative democracy , democracy , public administration , openness to experience , law and economics , sociology , political economy , epistemology , law , social psychology , politics , psychology , philosophy
This essay proposes a deliberative model of bureaucratic accountability and assesses its feasibility. Conventional wisdom suggests that a deliberative theory of bureaucratic accountability has little utility outside corporatist contexts. I reject this view because recent changes in patterns of interest representation have transformed both corporatist and pluralist bureaucracies into more hospitable environments for public deliberation. Contrary to the claims of democratic corporatists, recent pluralist practices of interest representation also seem to be compatible with public deliberation. Hence, movement toward greater openness in administrative decision‐making is possible from both liberal pluralist and corporatist starting points. Corporatism clearly has no monopoly on democratic deliberation.