Premium
Can a Pacifist Have a Conversation with Augustine? A Response to Alain Epp Weaver
Author(s) -
Turner Johnson James
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of religious ethics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.306
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 1467-9795
pISSN - 0384-9694
DOI - 10.1111/0384-9694.00069
Subject(s) - conversation , character (mathematics) , consistency (knowledge bases) , philosophy , epistemology , psychoanalysis , psychology , sociology , environmental ethics , social psychology , computer science , linguistics , artificial intelligence , mathematics , geometry
Christians have historically differed as to whether the wrongness of an act is to be located in the objective character of the act or in the intention of the agent. By blurring this distinction, Alain Epp Weaver fails to see the real principle of consistency that unites Augustine's analyses of warfare and lying. Likewise, by not appreciating the fact that Augustine analyzes the wrongness of the act in terms of intention whereas Yoder analyzes its wrongness in terms of its objective character, Weaver proposes a conversation between two figures who lack the framework of shared assumptions that makes engagement in conversation possible.