Premium
Estimates of the Health Risk Reductions Associated with Attainment of Alternative Particulate Matter Standards in Two U.S. Cities
Author(s) -
Deck Leland B.,
Post Ellen S.,
Smith Eric,
Wiener Matthew,
Cunningham Kathleen,
Richmond Harvey
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
risk analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.972
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1539-6924
pISSN - 0272-4332
DOI - 10.1111/0272-4332.215154
Subject(s) - aerodynamic diameter , particulates , environmental science , standard deviation , air quality index , environmental health , demography , statistics , toxicology , mathematics , geography , meteorology , medicine , chemistry , organic chemistry , sociology , biology
As part of its periodic re‐evaluation of particulate matter (PM) standards, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimated the health risk reductions associated with attainment of alternative PM standards in two locations in the United States with relatively complete air quality data: Philadelphia and Los Angeles. PM standards at the time of the analysis were defined for particles of aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 10 μm, denoted as PM‐10. The risk analyses estimated the risk reductions that would be associated with changing from attainment of the PM‐10 standards then in place to attainment of alternative standards using an indicator measuring fine particles, defined as those particles of aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 μm and denoted as PM‐2.5. Annual average PM‐2.5 standards of 12.5, 15, and 20 μg/m 3 were considered in various combinations with daily PM‐2.5 standards of 50 and 65 μg/m 3 . Attainment of a standard or set of standards was simulated by a proportional rollback of “as is” daily PM concentrations to daily PM concentrations that would just meet the standard(s). The predicted reductions in the incidence of health effects varied from zero, for those alternative standards already being met, to substantial reductions of over 88% of all PM‐associated incidence (e.g., in mortality associated with long‐term exposures in Los Angeles, under attainment of an annual standard of 12.5 μg/m 3 ). Sensitivity analyses and integrated uncertainty analyses assessed the multiple‐source uncertainty surrounding estimates of risk reduction.