Premium
Takeover Defenses of IPO Firms
Author(s) -
Field Laura Casares,
Karpoff Jonathan M.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
the journal of finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 18.151
H-Index - 299
eISSN - 1540-6261
pISSN - 0022-1082
DOI - 10.1111/0022-1082.00482
Subject(s) - initial public offering , shareholder , business , agency (philosophy) , agency cost , compensation (psychology) , monetary economics , principal–agent problem , finance , accounting , corporate governance , economics , psychology , philosophy , epistemology , psychoanalysis
Many firms deploy takeover defenses when they go public. IPO managers tend to deploy defenses when their compensation is high, shareholdings are small, and oversight from nonmanagerial shareholders is weak. The presence of a defense is negatively related to subsequent acquisition likelihood, yet has no impact on takeover premiums for firms that are acquired. These results do not support arguments that takeover defenses facilitate the eventual sale of IPO firms at high takeover premiums. Rather, they suggest that managers shift the cost of takeover protection onto nonmanagerial shareholders. Thus, agency problems are important even for firms at the IPO stage.