z-logo
Premium
Size and Thickness Effects on the Ductile Fracture Toughness of a 316 L(N) Austenitic Stainless Steel in As‐Received and Aged Conditions
Author(s) -
Cheng Sihan,
Garnier Jérôme,
Marini Bernard,
Madi Yazid,
Besson Jacques
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
fatigue and fracture of engineering materials and structures
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.887
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1460-2695
pISSN - 8756-758X
DOI - 10.1111/ffe.14665
Subject(s) - materials science , fracture toughness , austenite , metallurgy , toughness , composite material , fracture (geology) , microstructure
ABSTRACT Measuring ductile fracture toughness for materials requires the specimen size to be large enough for the tests to be valid. The presented work investigates the size related fracture behavior of as‐received and aged 316 L(N) stainless steel through an experimental approach. It focuses on the effects of the thickness and size of the specimens on the evaluated toughness. Compact tension (CT) specimens (thicknesses from 4 to 50 mm) and double edge notched tensile (DENT) specimens (thicknesses from 2 to 5 mm) were used. At as‐received state, CT tests lead to a nonmonotonic evolution of fracture toughness with a maximum at a critical thickness. At aged state, there is no significant thickness effect as all tests are valid. The essential work of fracture measured with DENT specimens appears to be equivalent toJ 0.2 $$ {J}_{0.2} $$ and consequently extends the nonmonotonic evolution of the fracture toughness at small thicknesses.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Empowering knowledge with every search

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom