z-logo
Premium
Global Trends and Perspectives on Dental Fragment Reattachment (1988–2024): A Bibliometric and Altmetric Review
Author(s) -
Mulinari Julia,
Souza Isadora Durante,
Pinho Nicolle Silveira,
Anjos Lucas Menezes,
Santana Carla Miranda,
Cardoso Mariane,
Oliveira Rocha Aurélio
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
dental traumatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.82
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1600-9657
pISSN - 1600-4469
DOI - 10.1111/edt.13017
ABSTRACT Fragment reattachment in traumatic injuries is notable for its excellent esthetic, morphological, and functional results. The aim of this study was to investigate the scientific history and trends in publications on dental fragment reattachment through a bibliometric and altmetric analysis. The search was conducted in October 2024 using Web of Science. Two researchers selected articles and extracted key study characteristics. Collaborative networks were generated using VOSviewer software. Dimensions was consulted to measure altmetric data. The Spearman correlation was used. A total of 129 articles were included. The most cited article received 160 citations. Studies were published between 1988 and 2024. The leading journal was Dental Traumatology ( n  = 55). Case reports ( n  = 63) were the most frequent study design. The majority of studies aimed at clinical case follow‐up ( n  = 71), with coronal fractures being most commonly reported ( n  = 96). Young patients were most affected in the selected studies ( n  = 49). Tewari N stood out ( n  = 8). The All India Institute of Medical Sciences was prominent with seven articles. Brazil was the most prevalent country ( n  = 29), and Asia was the most frequent continent ( n  = 57). Vosviewer demonstrated collaborations among authors. According to Dimensions, significant mentions were identified on Mendeley, followed by X users. This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive description of the technique of fragments reattachment in traumatized teeth, which has been studied for over 36 years. Studies on this technique primarily rely on case reports describing follow‐up in young patients. Intervention studies and systematic reviews are recommended. Additionally, more studies in Africa, Oceania, and North America are encouraged.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom